Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joshua Doležal's avatar

This is indeed a distinguishing feature of Substack. However, I think it sometimes contributes to low conversion rates for subscription upgrades. A lot of us who already write on Substack and who subscribe to WAY more newsletters than we could ever pay for find it easy to click "subscribe" when a colleague recommends another newsletter. And this gives a sense of progress when we see the free subscriber count going steadily up. But my paying subscriber count has plateaued for months, despite many attempts to change my model or offer different kinds of value-added content. I hear people with 5x and 10x the free subscribers that I have saying the same. So I'm wondering if we're reaching a kind of saturation point in some quarters or genres?

I was thinking about this the other day -- when I used to write for lit mags, I had a very clear sense of my audience. Typically editors at other journals were a lot like my creative writing mentors, they had a certain sensibility, read many of the same craft books. I knew how to craft an essay in a way that they would find compelling. But I know so little about my Substack readers. Sometimes they reply my Welcome email and explain why they subscribed. But that still doesn't tell me what they'd be willing to pay for. And so I think I'm winning at attracting readers who like my sensibility, just as I was in the lit mag game, but the conversion puzzle is a different thing altogether.

Anyway, a long-winded way of suggesting a question to tackle in a future post!

Expand full comment
Allison Deraney's avatar

Thank you for this, Karen! You have answered so many of the questions I had about this feature. I’m a newbie here on Substack so still have the training wheels on. I appreciate all you do to help us writers gain the most we can from this community. ✨🫶

Expand full comment
41 more comments...

No posts